Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bilbarin vs Shackleton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bilbarin edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bilbarin (1005) sits above Shackleton (983). Bilbarin skews owner-occupied (100%), Shackleton runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bilbarin edges out on average school ICSEA (1005 vs 983). Bilbarin also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 88%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBilbarin vs Shackleton

Common questions

Does Bilbarin or Shackleton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bilbarin scores 1005 vs 983 in Shackleton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bilbarin
Metric
Shackleton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$183/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$138/wk
$156/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$138/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
64.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
18
Population
114
42
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
1005
Avg ICSEA
983

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).