Bilbul vs Yenda.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $499,500 and $472,500. Yenda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Yenda (median $472,500) is roughly 6% cheaper to buy into than Bilbul ($499,500). Over the past year, Yenda (-1.6%) ran 9.2 percentage points ahead of Bilbul (-10.8%) on house-price growth.
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bilbul (972) sits above Yenda (949).
For buyers
Yenda is the lower entry point at $472,500 median, 6% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Yenda has run faster on 12-month capital growth, favouring growth-led investors.
For families
Bilbul edges out on average school ICSEA (972 vs 949).
Common questions
Is Bilbul or Yenda cheaper to buy in?
Yenda has the lower median house price at $472,500, roughly 6% below Bilbul ($499,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Bilbul or Yenda?
Over the past 12 months, Yenda grew -1.6% vs -10.8% in Bilbul, a gap of 9.2 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Bilbul or Yenda have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bilbul scores 972 vs 949 in Yenda. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Bilbul against another suburb