Side by sideSuburb comparison

Binda vs Lost River.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Binda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Binda (940) sits above Lost River (924). Lost River skews owner-occupied (92%), Binda runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Binda edges out on average school ICSEA (940 vs 924). Lost River also has a higher family-household share (96% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBinda vs Lost River

Common questions

Does Binda or Lost River have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Binda scores 940 vs 924 in Lost River. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Binda
Metric
Lost River

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$230/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$215/wk
81.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
291
Population
94
45
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
940
Avg ICSEA
924

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).