Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bindi Bindi vs Lake Hinds.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lake Hinds edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lake Hinds (978) sits above Bindi Bindi (956). Lake Hinds skews owner-occupied (88%), Bindi Bindi runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lake Hinds edges out on average school ICSEA (978 vs 956). Lake Hinds also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 77%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBindi Bindi vs Lake Hinds

Common questions

Does Bindi Bindi or Lake Hinds have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lake Hinds scores 978 vs 956 in Bindi Bindi. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bindi Bindi
Metric
Lake Hinds

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
59
Population
29
34
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
956
Avg ICSEA
978

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).