Side by sideSuburb comparison

Black Forest vs Everard Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,500,000 and $1,540,000. Black Forest edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Black Forest (median $1,500,000) is roughly 3% cheaper to buy into than Everard Park ($1,540,000). Over the past year, Black Forest (+7.3%) ran 7.3 percentage points ahead of Everard Park (0%) on house-price growth.

Black Forest scores higher on walkability (52/100 vs 48/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Everard Park (1099) sits above Black Forest (1096). Black Forest skews owner-occupied (58%), Everard Park runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Black Forest is the lower entry point at $1,500,000 median, 3% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Black Forest carries both higher gross yield (2.20% vs 2.16%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Everard Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1099 vs 1096).

Common questionsBlack Forest vs Everard Park

Common questions

Is Black Forest or Everard Park cheaper to buy in?

Black Forest has the lower median house price at $1,500,000, roughly 3% below Everard Park ($1,540,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Black Forest or Everard Park?

Over the past 12 months, Black Forest grew +7.3% vs 0% in Everard Park, a gap of 7.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Black Forest or Everard Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Everard Park scores 1099 vs 1096 in Black Forest. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Black Forest or Everard Park?

Black Forest scores 52/100 on walkability vs 48/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Black Forest or Everard Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.20% in Black Forest vs 2.16% in Everard Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Black Forest
Metric
Everard Park

Price & Market

$1,500,000
Median house
$1,540,000
$274,320
Median unit
$274,320
+7.3%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$635/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$640/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$430/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
48.0%
39.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

52
Walk score
48
0
Transit score
20
100
Bike score
100
1,982
Population
1,071
39
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1096
Avg ICSEA
1099

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).