Blue Mountain vs Sarina Range

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Blue Mountain (947) sits above Sarina Range (931). Sarina Range skews owner-occupied (95%), Blue Mountain runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

Buying in Blue Mountain or Sarina Range?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Blue Mountain? The free selling guide

Blue Mountain and Sarina Range side by side

MeasureBlue MountainSarina Range
Renting
Owner occupied81.0%95.0%
Renter occupied27.0%7.0%
Schools
Schools nearby195
Average ICSEA947931
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population83277
Median age4444
Climate
Annual rainfall1229 mm1517 mm
Mean max, January30.9°C30.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Blue Mountain edges out on average school ICSEA (947 vs 931). Sarina Range also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Blue Mountain vs Sarina Range: common questions

Does Blue Mountain or Sarina Range have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Blue Mountain scores 947 vs 931 in Sarina Range. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.