Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bodalla vs Cadgee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bodalla edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bodalla scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cadgee skews owner-occupied (122%), Bodalla runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsBodalla vs Cadgee

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Bodalla or Cadgee?

Bodalla scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bodalla
Metric
Cadgee

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$275/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
122.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

4
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
808
Population
27
53
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
927
Avg ICSEA
927

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).