Side by sideSuburb comparison

Boothendarra vs Namban.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Boothendarra edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boothendarra (1000) sits above Namban (942). Boothendarra skews owner-occupied (114%), Namban runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Boothendarra edges out on average school ICSEA (1000 vs 942). Namban also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBoothendarra vs Namban

Common questions

Does Boothendarra or Namban have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boothendarra scores 1000 vs 942 in Namban. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Boothendarra
Metric
Namban

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
114.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
35
53
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
5
1000
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).