Side by sideSuburb comparison

Border Ranges vs Loadstone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Loadstone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Loadstone (974) sits above Border Ranges (965).

Border Ranges
Metric
Loadstone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$238/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
6,492
Population
34
51
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
20
965
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Loadstone edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 965).

Common questionsBorder Ranges vs Loadstone

Common questions

Does Border Ranges or Loadstone have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Loadstone scores 974 vs 965 in Border Ranges. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.