Side by sideSuburb comparison

Boree vs Fernances Crossing.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Boree edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boree (942) sits above Fernances Crossing (935). Fernances Crossing skews owner-occupied (121%), Boree runs more rental-dense (94% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Boree edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 935). Boree also has a higher family-household share (97% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBoree vs Fernances Crossing

Common questions

Does Boree or Fernances Crossing have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boree scores 942 vs 935 in Fernances Crossing. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Boree
Metric
Fernances Crossing

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$575/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
121.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
93
Population
36
44
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
20
942
Avg ICSEA
935

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).