Side by sideSuburb comparison

Boree vs Garra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Boree edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boree (990) sits above Garra (974). Boree skews owner-occupied (94%), Garra runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Boree edges out on average school ICSEA (990 vs 974). Boree also has a higher family-household share (97% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBoree vs Garra

Common questions

Does Boree or Garra have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boree scores 990 vs 974 in Garra. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Boree
Metric
Garra

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$281/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$305/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
93
Population
117
44
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
2
990
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).