Side by sideSuburb comparison

Borrika vs Marama.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Marama edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Marama (980) sits above Borrika (961). Marama skews owner-occupied (100%), Borrika runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Marama edges out on average school ICSEA (980 vs 961).

Common questionsBorrika vs Marama

Common questions

Does Borrika or Marama have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Marama scores 980 vs 961 in Borrika. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Borrika
Metric
Marama

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$135/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$170/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$145/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
30
Population
51
44
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
2
961
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).