Side by sideSuburb comparison

Brittons Swamp vs Edith Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Brittons Swamp edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Brittons Swamp (899) sits above Edith Creek (886). Edith Creek skews owner-occupied (44%), Brittons Swamp runs more rental-dense (27% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Brittons Swamp edges out on average school ICSEA (899 vs 886). Edith Creek also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBrittons Swamp vs Edith Creek

Common questions

Does Brittons Swamp or Edith Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Brittons Swamp scores 899 vs 886 in Edith Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Brittons Swamp
Metric
Edith Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$125/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$225/wk
27.0%
Owner occupied
44.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
36
Population
116
41
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
899
Avg ICSEA
886

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).