Brownlow vs Kingscote

Kingscote scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 34/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Brownlow skews owner-occupied (94%), Kingscote runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

Buying in Brownlow or Kingscote?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Brownlow? The free selling guide

Brownlow and Kingscote side by side

MeasureBrownlowKingscote
Renting
House rent–$600/wk
Unit rent–$215/wk
Owner occupied94.0%65.0%
Renter occupied18.0%30.0%
Schools
Schools nearby11
Average ICSEA998998
Lifestyle and people
Walk score234
Transit score00
Bike score55
Population431,962
Median age5251
Climate
Annual rainfall453 mm459 mm
Mean max, January25.6°C25.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Brownlow vs Kingscote: common questions

Which is more walkable, Brownlow or Kingscote?

Kingscote scores 34/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.