Side by sideSuburb comparison

Buderim vs Tanawha.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Buderim edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Buderim scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tanawha has a heavier family-household mix (84% vs 73%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBuderim vs Tanawha

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Buderim or Tanawha?

Buderim scores 28/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Buderim
Metric
Tanawha

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$800/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$451/wk
$580/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$408/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

28
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
65
31,430
Population
1,312
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1063
Avg ICSEA
1063

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).