Bugle Ranges vs Green Hills Range

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bugle Ranges (1047) sits above Green Hills Range (1037). Green Hills Range skews owner-occupied (103%), Bugle Ranges runs more rental-dense (85% owner).

Buying in Bugle Ranges or Green Hills Range?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Bugle Ranges? The free selling guide

Bugle Ranges and Green Hills Range side by side

MeasureBugle RangesGreen Hills Range
Renting
Owner occupied85.0%103.0%
Renter occupied15.0%10.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1020
Average ICSEA10471037
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population28988
Median age4846
Climate
Annual rainfall726 mm786 mm
Mean max, January27.4°C26.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Bugle Ranges edges out on average school ICSEA (1047 vs 1037). Bugle Ranges also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Bugle Ranges vs Green Hills Range: common questions

Does Bugle Ranges or Green Hills Range have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bugle Ranges scores 1047 vs 1037 in Green Hills Range. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.