Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bumbunga vs Gleeson Hill.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gleeson Hill edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Gleeson Hill (986) sits above Bumbunga (982).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Gleeson Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (986 vs 982).

Common questionsBumbunga vs Gleeson Hill

Common questions

Does Bumbunga or Gleeson Hill have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Gleeson Hill scores 986 vs 982 in Bumbunga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Bumbunga
Metric
Gleeson Hill

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$128/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
36.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
20
Population
540
55
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
13
982
Avg ICSEA
986

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).