Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burges vs York.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. York edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

York scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 38/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. York skews owner-occupied (76%), Burges runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

York has a heavier family-household mix (63% vs 38%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBurges vs York

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Burges or York?

York scores 38/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Burges
Metric
York

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$288/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
38
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
11
Population
2,393
71
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
11
915
Avg ICSEA
915

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).