Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burnbank vs Lexton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lexton edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lexton (973) sits above Burnbank (970).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lexton edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 970).

Common questionsBurnbank vs Lexton

Common questions

Does Burnbank or Lexton have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lexton scores 973 vs 970 in Burnbank. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burnbank
Metric
Lexton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$190/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$322/wk
$165/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
47
Population
284
47
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
970
Avg ICSEA
973

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
23.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).