Side by sideSuburb comparison

Buxton vs Balmoral.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Buxton scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Balmoral (963) sits above Buxton (960).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Balmoral edges out on average school ICSEA (963 vs 960).

Common questionsBuxton vs Balmoral

Common questions

Does Buxton or Balmoral have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Balmoral scores 963 vs 960 in Buxton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Buxton or Balmoral?

Buxton scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Buxton
Metric
Balmoral

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$415/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$415/wk
$410/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$353/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
14.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

4
Walk score
0
10
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
0
2,071
Population
13,174
33
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
5
960
Avg ICSEA
963

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).