Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cabramatta vs Warwick Farm.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,400,000 and $1,050,000. Warwick Farm edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Warwick Farm (median $1,050,000) is roughly 33% cheaper to buy into than Cabramatta ($1,400,000). Over the past year, Warwick Farm (+12.2%) ran 3.7 percentage points ahead of Cabramatta (+8.5%) on house-price growth.

Cabramatta scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 58/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Warwick Farm (974) sits above Cabramatta (948). Cabramatta skews owner-occupied (48%), Warwick Farm runs more rental-dense (27% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Warwick Farm is the lower entry point at $1,050,000 median, 33% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Warwick Farm carries both higher gross yield (3.66% vs 2.60%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Warwick Farm edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 948). Cabramatta also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCabramatta vs Warwick Farm

Common questions

Is Cabramatta or Warwick Farm cheaper to buy in?

Warwick Farm has the lower median house price at $1,050,000, roughly 33% below Cabramatta ($1,400,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Cabramatta or Warwick Farm?

Over the past 12 months, Warwick Farm grew +12.2% vs +8.5% in Cabramatta, a gap of 3.7 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Cabramatta or Warwick Farm have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Warwick Farm scores 974 vs 948 in Cabramatta. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Cabramatta or Warwick Farm?

Cabramatta scores 100/100 on walkability vs 58/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Cabramatta or Warwick Farm?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.66% in Warwick Farm vs 2.60% in Cabramatta. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Cabramatta
Metric
Warwick Farm

Price & Market

$1,400,000
Median house
$1,050,000
$274,320
Median unit
$440,000
+8.5%
Annual growth (house)
+12.2%
Days on market

Rental

$700/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$740/wk
$460/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$540/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
27.0%
47.0%
Renter occupied
69.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
58
50
Transit score
20
100
Bike score
100
21,142
Population
6,135
40
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
948
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).