Side by sideSuburb comparison

Calamia vs Lanitza.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Calamia edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Calamia (1019) sits above Lanitza (891). Lanitza skews owner-occupied (83%), Calamia runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Calamia edges out on average school ICSEA (1019 vs 891).

Common questionsCalamia vs Lanitza

Common questions

Does Calamia or Lanitza have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Calamia scores 1019 vs 891 in Lanitza. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Calamia
Metric
Lanitza

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$313/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
24
Population
313
54
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
7
1019
Avg ICSEA
891

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).