Side by sideSuburb comparison

Callandoon vs Kioma.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Callandoon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Callandoon (962) sits above Kioma (919). Callandoon skews owner-occupied (33%), Kioma runs more rental-dense (23% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Callandoon edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 919). Kioma also has a higher family-household share (69% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCallandoon vs Kioma

Common questions

Does Callandoon or Kioma have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Callandoon scores 962 vs 919 in Kioma. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Callandoon
Metric
Kioma

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$110/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$44/wk
33.0%
Owner occupied
23.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
54.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
32
Population
32
32
Median age
25

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
962
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).