Side by sideSuburb comparison

Calwell vs Gordon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gordon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Gordon scores higher on walkability (18/100 vs 22/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsCalwell vs Gordon

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Calwell or Gordon?

Gordon scores 22/100 on walkability vs 18/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Calwell
Metric
Gordon

Price & Market

$845,000
Median house
$627,750
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$430/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$410/wk
$448/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

18
Walk score
22
90
Transit score
100
100
Bike score
100
5,730
Population
7,892
37
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1032
Avg ICSEA
1032

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).