Cambridge Park vs Cambridge Gardens.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
Cambridge Park scores higher on walkability (34/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cambridge Gardens (981) sits above Cambridge Park (980). Cambridge Gardens skews owner-occupied (79%), Cambridge Park runs more rental-dense (61% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cambridge Gardens edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 980).
Common questions
Does Cambridge Park or Cambridge Gardens have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cambridge Gardens scores 981 vs 980 in Cambridge Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Cambridge Park or Cambridge Gardens?
Cambridge Park scores 34/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Cambridge Park against another suburb