Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cambridge Park vs Jordan Springs.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jordan Springs edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jordan Springs (981) sits above Cambridge Park (980).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Jordan Springs edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 980). Jordan Springs also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 73%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCambridge Park vs Jordan Springs

Common questions

Does Cambridge Park or Jordan Springs have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jordan Springs scores 981 vs 980 in Cambridge Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cambridge Park
Metric
Jordan Springs

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$385/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$530/wk
61.0%
Owner occupied
64.0%
37.0%
Renter occupied
34.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

34
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
7,054
Population
11,772
34
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
980
Avg ICSEA
981

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).