Cameron Corner vs Thargomindah

Thargomindah scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Thargomindah skews owner-occupied (59%), Cameron Corner runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

Buying in Cameron Corner or Thargomindah?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cameron Corner? The free selling guide

Cameron Corner and Thargomindah side by side

MeasureCameron CornerThargomindah
Renting
Owner occupied43.0%59.0%
Renter occupied–41.0%
Schools
Schools nearby11
Average ICSEA877877
Lifestyle and people
Walk score012
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population19243
Median age2238
Climate
Annual rainfall243 mm278 mm
Mean max, January38.5°C38.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Thargomindah has a heavier family-household mix (69% vs 57%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Cameron Corner vs Thargomindah: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cameron Corner or Thargomindah?

Thargomindah scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.