Cardwell vs Lumholtz

Cardwell scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cardwell (886) sits above Lumholtz (881).

Buying in Cardwell or Lumholtz?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cardwell? The free selling guide

Cardwell and Lumholtz side by side

MeasureCardwellLumholtz
Renting
Owner occupied57.0%–
Renter occupied39.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby1010
Average ICSEA886881
Lifestyle and people
Walk score220
Transit score100
Bike score100
Population1,320–
Median age60–
Climate
Annual rainfall2084 mm1849 mm
Mean max, January31.4°C30.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cardwell edges out on average school ICSEA (886 vs 881).

Cardwell vs Lumholtz: common questions

Does Cardwell or Lumholtz have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cardwell scores 886 vs 881 in Lumholtz. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Cardwell or Lumholtz?

Cardwell scores 22/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.