Side by sideSuburb comparison

Carnarvon vs Greys Plain.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Carnarvon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Carnarvon scores higher on walkability (38/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Carnarvon skews owner-occupied (55%), Greys Plain runs more rental-dense (14% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Greys Plain has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 58%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsCarnarvon vs Greys Plain

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Carnarvon or Greys Plain?

Carnarvon scores 38/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Carnarvon
Metric
Greys Plain

Price & Market

$315,000
Median house
$175,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$209/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$209/wk
$210/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$65/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
14.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied
84.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

38
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
0
281
Population
156
39
Median age
29

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
934
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).