Side by sideSuburb comparison

Carnham vs Upper Fine Flower.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Fine Flower edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Fine Flower (858) sits above Carnham (840). Carnham skews owner-occupied (100%), Upper Fine Flower runs more rental-dense (87% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Fine Flower edges out on average school ICSEA (858 vs 840).

Common questionsCarnham vs Upper Fine Flower

Common questions

Does Carnham or Upper Fine Flower have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Fine Flower scores 858 vs 840 in Carnham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Carnham
Metric
Upper Fine Flower

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$255/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
Renter occupied
40.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
4
Population
46
73
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
840
Avg ICSEA
858

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).