Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cathundral vs Gin Gin.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Cathundral skews owner-occupied (122%), Gin Gin runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cathundral has a heavier family-household mix (78% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Cathundral
Metric
Gin Gin

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$160/wk
122.0%
Owner occupied
45.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
159
32
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
838
Avg ICSEA
838

Climate

414 mm
Annual rainfall
414 mm
33.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
33.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).