Side by sideSuburb comparison

Catumnal vs Gredgwin.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Catumnal edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Catumnal (984) sits above Gredgwin (968). Gredgwin skews owner-occupied (120%), Catumnal runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Catumnal edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 968).

Common questionsCatumnal vs Gredgwin

Common questions

Does Catumnal or Gredgwin have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Catumnal scores 984 vs 968 in Gredgwin. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Catumnal
Metric
Gredgwin

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$153/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
57.0%
Owner occupied
120.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
13
35
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
7
984
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).