Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cedar Pocket vs Woondum.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cedar Pocket edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cedar Pocket (988) sits above Woondum (972). Woondum skews owner-occupied (125%), Cedar Pocket runs more rental-dense (88% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cedar Pocket edges out on average school ICSEA (988 vs 972).

Common questionsCedar Pocket vs Woondum

Common questions

Does Cedar Pocket or Woondum have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cedar Pocket scores 988 vs 972 in Woondum. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cedar Pocket
Metric
Woondum

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$338/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$251/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
125.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
332
Population
66
53
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
12
988
Avg ICSEA
972

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).