Cedar Pocket vs Woondum
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cedar Pocket (988) sits above Woondum (972). Woondum skews owner-occupied (125%), Cedar Pocket runs more rental-dense (88% owner).
Buying in Cedar Pocket or Woondum?
Selling in Cedar Pocket? The free selling guide
Cedar Pocket and Woondum side by side
| Measure | Cedar Pocket | Woondum |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 88.0% | 125.0% |
| Renter occupied | 10.0% | – |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 3 | 12 |
| Average ICSEA | 988 | 972 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 332 | 66 |
| Median age | 53 | 44 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1252 mm | 1171 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.0°C | 30.5°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Cedar Pocket edges out on average school ICSEA (988 vs 972).
Cedar Pocket vs Woondum: common questions
Does Cedar Pocket or Woondum have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cedar Pocket scores 988 vs 972 in Woondum. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Cedar Pocket with
Choosing between Cedar Pocket and Woondum?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.