Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ceduna vs Merghiny.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ceduna edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Ceduna scores higher on walkability (46/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Ceduna skews owner-occupied (53%), Merghiny runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ceduna has a heavier family-household mix (67% vs 25%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsCeduna vs Merghiny

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Ceduna or Merghiny?

Ceduna scores 46/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Ceduna
Metric
Merghiny

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$160/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
42.0%
42.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

46
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,955
Population
17
37
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
826
Avg ICSEA
826

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).