Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ceduna Waters vs Laura Bay.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Laura Bay skews owner-occupied (100%), Ceduna Waters runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Laura Bay has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 67%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Ceduna Waters
Metric
Laura Bay

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$160/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$204/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
186
Population
11
38
Median age
64

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
826
Avg ICSEA
826

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).