Side by sideSuburb comparison

Chances Plain vs Chinchilla.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Chances Plain skews owner-occupied (71%), Chinchilla runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Chances Plain has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 68%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Chances Plain
Metric
Chinchilla

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$470/wk
$231/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$340/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
54.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied
42.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
158
Population
7,068
43
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
965
Avg ICSEA
965

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).