Chapman Bore vs Naturi

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Naturi (930) sits above Chapman Bore (929). Naturi skews owner-occupied (90%), Chapman Bore runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Chapman Bore or Naturi?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Chapman Bore? The free selling guide

Chapman Bore and Naturi side by side

MeasureChapman BoreNaturi
Renting
Owner occupied38.0%90.0%
Renter occupied63.0%30.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1313
Average ICSEA929930
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population2625
Median age3245
Climate
Annual rainfall353 mm370 mm
Mean max, January30.0°C29.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Naturi edges out on average school ICSEA (930 vs 929). Chapman Bore also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Chapman Bore vs Naturi: common questions

Does Chapman Bore or Naturi have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Naturi scores 930 vs 929 in Chapman Bore. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.