Chasm Creek vs Wivenhoe

Wivenhoe scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Chasm Creek skews owner-occupied (80%), Wivenhoe runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in Chasm Creek or Wivenhoe?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Chasm Creek? The free selling guide

Chasm Creek and Wivenhoe side by side

MeasureChasm CreekWivenhoe
Renting
House rent$230/wk$240/wk
Unit rent$265/wk$243/wk
Owner occupied80.0%59.0%
Renter occupied24.0%38.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1111
Average ICSEA939939
Lifestyle and people
Walk score014
Transit score00
Bike score020
Population53235
Median age4740
Climate
Annual rainfall896 mm896 mm
Mean max, January21.3°C21.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Chasm Creek vs Wivenhoe: common questions

Which is more walkable, Chasm Creek or Wivenhoe?

Wivenhoe scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.