Side by sideSuburb comparison

Chirnside Park vs Yering.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Yering edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Yering (1034) sits above Chirnside Park (1032). Yering skews owner-occupied (103%), Chirnside Park runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Yering edges out on average school ICSEA (1034 vs 1032). Yering also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsChirnside Park vs Yering

Common questions

Does Chirnside Park or Yering have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Yering scores 1034 vs 1032 in Chirnside Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Chirnside Park
Metric
Yering

Price & Market

$940,000
Median house
$595,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
Rent (unit / wk)
83.0%
Owner occupied
103.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
70
Bike score
15
11,779
Population
138
38
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1032
Avg ICSEA
1034

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).