Chute vs Mount Lonarch

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chute (986) sits above Mount Lonarch (959). Chute skews owner-occupied (100%), Mount Lonarch runs more rental-dense (88% owner).

Buying in Chute or Mount Lonarch?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Chute? The free selling guide

Chute and Mount Lonarch side by side

MeasureChuteMount Lonarch
Renting
Owner occupied100.0%88.0%
Schools
Schools nearby53
Average ICSEA986959
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1344
Median age6350
Climate
Annual rainfall656 mm577 mm
Mean max, January26.9°C27.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Chute edges out on average school ICSEA (986 vs 959). Chute also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Chute vs Mount Lonarch: common questions

Does Chute or Mount Lonarch have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chute scores 986 vs 959 in Mount Lonarch. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.