Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cinnabar vs Goomeribong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cinnabar edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cinnabar (915) sits above Goomeribong (834). Goomeribong skews owner-occupied (114%), Cinnabar runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cinnabar edges out on average school ICSEA (915 vs 834).

Common questionsCinnabar vs Goomeribong

Common questions

Does Cinnabar or Goomeribong have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cinnabar scores 915 vs 834 in Goomeribong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cinnabar
Metric
Goomeribong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$245/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$165/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
114.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
83
Population
49
43
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
8
915
Avg ICSEA
834

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).