Claremont vs Otago

Claremont scores higher on walkability (24/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Otago (938) sits above Claremont (900).

Buying in Claremont or Otago?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Claremont? The free selling guide

Claremont and Otago side by side

MeasureClaremontOtago
Renting
House rent$320/wk$400/wk
Unit rent$272/wk$455/wk
Owner occupied–89.0%
Renter occupied–4.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA900938
Lifestyle and people
Walk score240
Transit score00
Bike score150
Population–596
Median age–51
Climate
Annual rainfall567 mm550 mm
Mean max, January23.3°C22.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Otago edges out on average school ICSEA (938 vs 900).

Claremont vs Otago: common questions

Does Claremont or Otago have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Otago scores 938 vs 900 in Claremont. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Claremont or Otago?

Claremont scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.