Side by sideSuburb comparison

Clarence Point vs Badger Head.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Clarence Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clarence Point (910) sits above Badger Head (905). Clarence Point skews owner-occupied (96%), Badger Head runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Clarence Point edges out on average school ICSEA (910 vs 905). Clarence Point also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 60%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsClarence Point vs Badger Head

Common questions

Does Clarence Point or Badger Head have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clarence Point scores 910 vs 905 in Badger Head. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Clarence Point
Metric
Badger Head

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
96.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
266
Population
62
59
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
910
Avg ICSEA
905

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).