Side by sideSuburb comparison

Claypans vs Copeville.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Copeville edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Copeville (951) sits above Claypans (946). Claypans skews owner-occupied (100%), Copeville runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Copeville edges out on average school ICSEA (951 vs 946). Claypans also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsClaypans vs Copeville

Common questions

Does Claypans or Copeville have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Copeville scores 951 vs 946 in Claypans. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Claypans
Metric
Copeville

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$215/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$123/wk
$183/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$80/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
4
Population
44
50
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
946
Avg ICSEA
951

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).