Cobar Park vs Hermitage Flat

Hermitage Flat scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 54/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cobar Park skews owner-occupied (123%), Hermitage Flat runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

Buying in Cobar Park or Hermitage Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Cobar Park? The free selling guide

Cobar Park and Hermitage Flat side by side

MeasureCobar ParkHermitage Flat
Renting
House rent$480/wk$480/wk
Owner occupied123.0%67.0%
Renter occupied23.0%25.0%
Schools
Schools nearby77
Average ICSEA937937
Lifestyle and people
Walk score254
Transit score00
Bike score95100
Population36323
Median age4848
Climate
Annual rainfall808 mm793 mm
Mean max, January25.6°C26.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Cobar Park has a heavier family-household mix (69% vs 55%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Cobar Park vs Hermitage Flat: common questions

Which is more walkable, Cobar Park or Hermitage Flat?

Hermitage Flat scores 54/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.