Coconuts vs Coquette Point

Coconuts scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Coquette Point skews owner-occupied (89%), Coconuts runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

Buying in Coconuts or Coquette Point?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Coconuts? The free selling guide

Coconuts and Coquette Point side by side

MeasureCoconutsCoquette Point
Renting
Owner occupied62.0%89.0%
Renter occupied38.0%7.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1010
Average ICSEA877877
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population216117
Median age5659
Climate
Annual rainfall3390 mm3330 mm
Mean max, January31.0°C30.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Coconuts vs Coquette Point: common questions

Which is more walkable, Coconuts or Coquette Point?

Coconuts scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.