Side by sideSuburb comparison

Codrington vs St Helens.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. St Helens edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving St Helens (1004) sits above Codrington (977).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

St Helens edges out on average school ICSEA (1004 vs 977).

Common questionsCodrington vs St Helens

Common questions

Does Codrington or St Helens have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), St Helens scores 1004 vs 977 in Codrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Codrington
Metric
St Helens

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$187/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$187/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,255
Population
1,255
47
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
19
977
Avg ICSEA
1004

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).