Coggan vs Budden
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coggan (940) sits above Budden (938). Coggan skews owner-occupied (100%), Budden runs more rental-dense (70% owner).
Buying in Coggan or Budden?
The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guideSelling in Coggan? The free selling guide
Coggan and Budden side by side
| Measure | Coggan | Budden |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 100.0% | 70.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 2 | 2 |
| Average ICSEA | 940 | 938 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 3 | 16 |
| Median age | 66 | 58 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 594 mm | 633 mm |
| Mean max, January | 32.2°C | 31.2°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Coggan edges out on average school ICSEA (940 vs 938).
Coggan vs Budden: common questions
Does Coggan or Budden have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coggan scores 940 vs 938 in Budden. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Coggan with
Choosing between Coggan and Budden?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.