Side by sideSuburb comparison

Colebatch vs Coorong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Colebatch edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Colebatch (1000) sits above Coorong (883). Colebatch skews owner-occupied (79%), Coorong runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Colebatch edges out on average school ICSEA (1000 vs 883).

Common questionsColebatch vs Coorong

Common questions

Does Colebatch or Coorong have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Colebatch scores 1000 vs 883 in Coorong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Colebatch
Metric
Coorong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$198/wk
$75/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
42.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
56
Population
53
56
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
1000
Avg ICSEA
883

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).