Side by sideSuburb comparison

Colo Vale vs Alpine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Colo Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Colo Vale (1010) sits above Alpine (1005). Colo Vale skews owner-occupied (81%), Alpine runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Colo Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (1010 vs 1005).

Common questionsColo Vale vs Alpine

Common questions

Does Colo Vale or Alpine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Colo Vale scores 1010 vs 1005 in Alpine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Colo Vale
Metric
Alpine

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$430/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$430/wk
$430/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
81.0%
Owner occupied
65.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
35
Bike score
0
1,775
Population
141
38
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
8
1010
Avg ICSEA
1005

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).